Editorial policy
QRFlow is maintained as a product plus guide system. This page explains how search-facing content is kept close to the actual generator and support behavior.
1) Product-first publishing
QRFlow publishes around real QR workflows: generation, scanning, print sizing, dynamic redirect operations, and troubleshooting. Support content should point back into working tools instead of existing as standalone SEO filler.
2) Review model
Guide pages are maintained by the QRFlow Editorial Team and reviewed against the current generator behavior, payload rules, and export paths inside the product. Content that no longer matches the tool should be corrected or de-indexed.
3) Canonical and duplication policy
When multiple pages target the same workflow with slightly different wording, one page is treated as the primary ranking page. Supporting variants should canonicalize or stay out of index instead of competing with each other.
4) Evidence standards
Practical claims should be tied to reproducible QR behavior: what payload opens, what export format survives print, what quiet zone is needed, and what user action the scan should trigger. Unsupported claims should not be published as product advice.
5) Update and correction policy
When a generator flow, payload rule, or support recommendation changes, the connected guide, topic hub, and template page should be updated together. Broken examples, outdated screenshots, and mismatched copy should be corrected on the live page rather than left to drift.
6) Monetization boundaries
If ads are enabled, they are kept away from the main generator workspace and utility flows. Commercial surfaces should not dictate the structure of core support or product content.